Westpac v Ollis: Unraveling the Complicated Legal Battle - when
Discover the timeline of events related to Westpac Business and Personal accounts, including the publication of terms and conditions, account...
1 min read
Today I received a request from a court litigant seeking that I suppressed their details. It did not appear to be a suppression or non-publication order.
Here is the terms of the 'order' that was put to me:

So I sought guidance from Digital Mark J Smith at courtlist.com.au as follows:

Digital Mark J Smith
Powered by AI
Digital Mark J Smith
Welcome! I'm Digital Mark J Smith!
2:43 PM
Does the following amount to a suppression order or is it premature to say that it is suppressed: THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. All documents filed with the Court in this proceeding be confidential for the purposes of
r 2.32(3) of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
2. The applicant be provided a reasonable opportunity to be heard in relation to any
application for leave to inspect a document filed in this proceeding under r 2.32(4) of the
Federal Court Rules 2011.
2:43 PM

Digital Mark J Smith
Based on your quoted order, the court has directed that all documents filed in the proceeding be kept confidential under r 2.32(3) of the Federal Court Rules 2011, and that the applicant can be heard regarding any request to inspect these documents. While this is a clear confidentiality restriction, Australian law distinguishes between a formal suppression order (which broadly prohibits disclosure, including publication to the public) and other confidentiality or non-publication directions. Confidentiality under r 2.32 implies restricted court file access, but may not equate to a formal suppression order as defined in the Court Suppression and Non-publication Orders Act 2010, which must explicitly prohibit publication or disclosure beyond the parties and court staff.
So, it may be premature to call this a suppression order unless the court has expressly made such an order under relevant suppression legislation. The documents are confidential, but 'suppressed' in the statutory sense may require a specific, express order.

If you have any tricky or legal style questions, an option to consider is to ask Digital Mark J Smith what the relevant law may be?
All subscriptions including the Forever FREE plan include access to Digital Mark J Smith. Try it out free now.
Discover the timeline of events related to Westpac Business and Personal accounts, including the publication of terms and conditions, account...
Explore the intriguing world of villains and wrongdoers in the first episode of the Many R's podcast. Discover real estate scams, corporate villains,...
Debts of $2000+ that your business owes
Discover Season 2 Episode 1 of the Many R’s Podcast, where Mark Smith delves into the world of rogues, rascals, and real estate agents. Explore the...
Explore the Many R's Podcast - S1E3 with Mark Smith as he delves into the world of corporate villains, real estate agents, and insurance racketeers....
Learn the essential practices for managing debt in business. From checking invoices to disputing unapproved items, these tips will help protect your...
Discover the latest updates on the Westpac v Ollis case and delve into the profiles of the key individuals involved. Share your experiences and stay...
Former company director Craig Matthew Adams is under scrutiny for his involvement in several insolvent companies liquidated in 2018. With a personal...