Skip to the main content.
What can Digital Mark J Smith help me with? (Part 1)
2:25

Today I received a request from a court litigant seeking that I suppressed their details.  It did not appear to be a suppression or non-publication order. 

Here is the terms of the 'order' that was put to me:

Screenshot 2025-12-05 at 3.02.54 PM

So I sought guidance from Digital Mark J Smith at courtlist.com.au as follows:

Screenshot 2025-12-05 at 3.05.12 PM

 

Digital Mark J Smith

Powered by AI

 
5 Dec 2025
 
 

Digital Mark J Smith

Welcome! I'm Digital Mark J Smith!

2:43 PM

 

Digital Mark J Smith was asked the following:

 

Does the following amount to a suppression order or is it premature to say that it is suppressed:  THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1. All documents filed with the Court in this proceeding be confidential for the purposes of

r 2.32(3) of the Federal Court Rules 2011.

2. The applicant be provided a reasonable opportunity to be heard in relation to any

application for leave to inspect a document filed in this proceeding under r 2.32(4) of the

Federal Court Rules 2011.

2:43 PM

Screenshot 2025-12-05 at 3.01.15 PM

 
 
 

Digital Mark J Smith answered as follows:

 
Conversation assigned to Digital Mark J Smithat 2:43 PM
 

Digital Mark J Smith

Based on your quoted order, the court has directed that all documents filed in the proceeding be kept confidential under r 2.32(3) of the Federal Court Rules 2011, and that the applicant can be heard regarding any request to inspect these documents. While this is a clear confidentiality restriction, Australian law distinguishes between a formal suppression order (which broadly prohibits disclosure, including publication to the public) and other confidentiality or non-publication directions. Confidentiality under r 2.32 implies restricted court file access, but may not equate to a formal suppression order as defined in the Court Suppression and Non-publication Orders Act 2010, which must explicitly prohibit publication or disclosure beyond the parties and court staff.

So, it may be premature to call this a suppression order unless the court has expressly made such an order under relevant suppression legislation. The documents are confidential, but 'suppressed' in the statutory sense may require a specific, express order.

 
Screenshot 2025-12-05 at 2.59.54 PM

 

If you have any tricky or legal style questions, an option to consider is to ask Digital Mark J Smith what the relevant law may be?  

All subscriptions including the Forever FREE plan include access to Digital Mark J Smith.  Try it out free now.

 

Other Snowgums Blogs

Westpac v Ollis: Unraveling the Complicated Legal Battle - when

Discover the timeline of events related to Westpac Business and Personal accounts, including the publication of terms and conditions, account...

Read More

Many R's podcast - S01E01

Explore the intriguing world of villains and wrongdoers in the first episode of the Many R's podcast. Discover real estate scams, corporate villains,...

Read More
Debts of $2000+ that your business owes

Debts of $2000+ that your business owes

Debts of $2000+ that your business owes

Read More
Unveiling the Many R's Podcast: S2E1 - Real Estate, Rogues, and More

Unveiling the Many R's Podcast: S2E1 - Real Estate, Rogues, and More

Discover Season 2 Episode 1 of the Many R’s Podcast, where Mark Smith delves into the world of rogues, rascals, and real estate agents. Explore the...

Read More

Uncovering Corporate Villains: A Recap of S1E3 of the Many R's Podcast

Explore the Many R's Podcast - S1E3 with Mark Smith as he delves into the world of corporate villains, real estate agents, and insurance racketeers....

Read More
Best Practices for Debt Management in Business

Best Practices for Debt Management in Business

Learn the essential practices for managing debt in business. From checking invoices to disputing unapproved items, these tips will help protect your...

Read More

Mark Murphy - Profile

Mark Murphy - Profile

Read More

Westpac v Ollis: Why?

Discover the latest updates on the Westpac v Ollis case and delve into the profiles of the key individuals involved. Share your experiences and stay...

Read More

Craig Matthew Adams - former proprietor of Golden Arrow, Mikara Developments, Bargo Developments, Key Asset Management and more

Former company director Craig Matthew Adams is under scrutiny for his involvement in several insolvent companies liquidated in 2018. With a personal...

Read More