DCP Solutions Blog, People and Stories

What can Digital Mark J Smith help me with? (Part 1)

Written by Mark Smith | 5 December 2025 11:30:20 AM

Today I received a request from a court litigant seeking that I suppressed their details.  It did not appear to be a suppression or non-publication order. 

Here is the terms of the 'order' that was put to me:

So I sought guidance from Digital Mark J Smith at courtlist.com.au as follows:

 

Digital Mark J Smith

Powered by AI

 
5 Dec 2025
 
 

Digital Mark J Smith

Welcome! I'm Digital Mark J Smith!

2:43 PM

 

Digital Mark J Smith was asked the following:

 

Does the following amount to a suppression order or is it premature to say that it is suppressed:  THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1. All documents filed with the Court in this proceeding be confidential for the purposes of

r 2.32(3) of the Federal Court Rules 2011.

2. The applicant be provided a reasonable opportunity to be heard in relation to any

application for leave to inspect a document filed in this proceeding under r 2.32(4) of the

Federal Court Rules 2011.

2:43 PM

 
 
 

Digital Mark J Smith answered as follows:

 
Conversation assigned to Digital Mark J Smithat 2:43 PM
 

Digital Mark J Smith

Based on your quoted order, the court has directed that all documents filed in the proceeding be kept confidential under r 2.32(3) of the Federal Court Rules 2011, and that the applicant can be heard regarding any request to inspect these documents. While this is a clear confidentiality restriction, Australian law distinguishes between a formal suppression order (which broadly prohibits disclosure, including publication to the public) and other confidentiality or non-publication directions. Confidentiality under r 2.32 implies restricted court file access, but may not equate to a formal suppression order as defined in the Court Suppression and Non-publication Orders Act 2010, which must explicitly prohibit publication or disclosure beyond the parties and court staff.

So, it may be premature to call this a suppression order unless the court has expressly made such an order under relevant suppression legislation. The documents are confidential, but 'suppressed' in the statutory sense may require a specific, express order.

 

 

If you have any tricky or legal style questions, an option to consider is to ask Digital Mark J Smith what the relevant law may be?  

All subscriptions including the Forever FREE plan include access to Digital Mark J Smith.  Try it out free now.