Posted on Leave a comment

Bernard & Fiona Hall – property holdings

Hall family tree of businesses

Bernard & Fiona Hall, directly or indirectly (as at 8 November 2019) have interests in the following properties (subject to change).

At auction in Orange on 24 July 2019, Bernard Hall bid to purchase all 5 of the above properties.

Bernard has thus far (as at 8 November 2019) only completed the purchase of Brooklyn with a further $7.35m outstanding to purchase the above excluding Brooklyn.

Subject to orders of the NSW Supreme Court, these properties are in the process of being sold.

It is understood that a notice to complete has been served upon Bernard requiring him or his purchasing entities to complete the settlement of the 4 remaining properties by the close of business on 14 November 2019.  The possible ramifications of failing to complete are discussed here.

If you have any comments or information about Bernard & Fiona Hall, we’d love to hear from you including any documents via the instant chats below, through the below form or by phone on 1300-327123.

Posted on Leave a comment

Hall family overview – Bernard & Fiona and Bonny Glen Fruits Pty Ltd.

Hall family tree of businesses

Below is an overview of the corporate structure of the Hall family, being the family of Frederick Charles Hall & Pamela Therese Hall.

The Hall’s also own a range of properties discussed here on a related page – click here.

Relevant members of the Hall family for the purposes of this profile are:

Frederick Charles Hall – father

Pamela Therese Hall – mother

Bernard Francis Hall & Fiona Catherine Hall – son and daughter in law

Timothy Simon Hall – brother of Bernard (but not relevant to the class action as a defendant).

Hall family tree of businesses
Hall family tree of businesses

 

 

 

If you have any comments or information about Bernard & Fiona Hall, we’d love to hear from you including any documents via the instant chats below, through the below form or by phone on 1300-327123.

 

 

 

Posted on Leave a comment

Hakan Kutup charged with fraud and forgery, appears in court

Hakan Kutup

Hakan Kutup, a former Century 21 real estate agent appeared yesterday in the Wollongong Local Court.  Hakan, of 24 Stradbroke St, Shell Cove, has been the subject of other posts here on this website.  Hakan appeared in court charged in relation to 27 counts involving fraud, forgeries or conversion of money but we understand this number may increase?

How was Hakan Kutup able to carry out alleged crimes?

 

Mark Smith, Director of DC Partners was engaged after the alleged frauds were discovered by the victim, a local funds manager in Sydney.

Mark is the person who reported the matters to NSW Police and NSW Fairtrading.

Mark believe’s that NSW Fairtrading may have been negligent and is co-ordinating a class-action for potential victims of Hakan Kutup.  Class-action participants could include victims of Hakan’s company formerly Century 21 Ultimate Real Estate in Wollongong.

Mark alleges NSW Fairtrading knew or ought to have known about complaints about Hakan Kutup stretching back perhaps more than a decade and failed to investigate.

Mark is organising for those who are interested in joining a class action against the NSW Fairtrading and invites anyone who has lost money – no matter how small to complete the form below.

Interestingly, the Illawarra Mercury / Daily Telegraph hint at potentially more charges against the Kutup family.  It is thought these may relate to the operations of a sales trust by Hakan Kutup?  These publications quote the court that there was uncovered “misappropriated funds” in the sum of $220,515 from a Sales Trust account.

DC Partners is keen to talk to or help any persons that have had negative dealings with the Kutup family now matter how old or recently – please complete our contact form below (joining the class action is optional):

 

NSW Fairtrading class action

join

 

Who is Hakan Kutup?

 

Hakan is:

  • the father of Jeyda Kutup (an estate agent and purported Instagram influencer in the Wollongong area),
  • brother of Allan Kutup (a presently still licensed real estate agent in the Wollongong area) and
  • uncle to Eren Kutup.

Eren and Allan are directors of EK Property Group Pty Ltd, a seemingly unlicensed real estate agent (??? more to come on this front shortly – watch this space) and mortgage broker also operating in the Wollongong area.

Receivers have recently been appointed to EK Property Group over the sum of $600k said to be owed to the above Sydney based money lender (presently before the Sydney District Court, Civil division).  Eren & Jeyda are also personally being sued by the money lender.

 

If readers have other information on the Kutup’s please feel free to complete the below form or email any tips to:  mark@markjsmith.com  or call  1300-327123 (7 days till late).

6 November 2019

 

Posted on Leave a comment

Hakan Kutup arrested, what next?

Hakan Kutup

Arrest

DC Partners has been assisting the victim of a crime for some months.

As reported, on 6 September 2019, Hakan KUTUP (“Hakan“) attended Lake Illawarra Police Station.  Hakan participated in an interview and was charged with:

  • 12 x Fraud,
  • 12 x Forgery,
  • 3 x Fraudulent conversion of money.

Hakan was granted strict conditional bail and will appear at Wollongong Local Court on 5 November 2019.

For other victims

DC Partners wishes to encourage anyone who has been a victim of a crime to report these immediately to NSW Police.  Specifically locals in the Illawarra should contact Lake Illawarra Police and detectives at 6 Pioneer Drive, Oak Flats 2529.

But, in addition, DC Partners are separately keen to hear from anyone who may have had past dealings with:

  1. Hakan during his time with ParkTrent Properties (aka Rotten Ron Cross),
  2. Century 21,
  3. Century 21 Ultimate Real Estate or elsewhere.

The previous dealings could be involving persons who have:

  1. not had rental bond’s deposited correctly,
  2. had suspicious charges added that they were not expecting,
  3. made previous complaints to NSW Fairtrading,
  4. received late rental payments,
  5. received no rental payments,
  6. not received rental bonds back at the end of a tenancy or otherwise.

No amount too big or too small.

Hakan’s family in property

Similarly, anyone with any similar experiences when dealing with relatives of Hakan KUTUP may also be of interest?  Other relatives of Hakan Kutup seemingly involved in property include:

Other remedies

DCP Litigation acknowledges the glacial speed NSW Fairtrading seems to work at?  We are considering helping a number of victims to pursue claims.  This may involve a class action against NSW Fairtrading.  We are also helping clients claim against the government’s Fidelity Fund or via the court’s.

In this regard, we are considering a class action for victims of Hakan Kutup perhaps against NSW Fairtrading?

Please complete the contact form to register an interest in joining the class action.  A class action requires a minimum of 7 claimants with the same loss against a common defendant.

NSW Fairtrading class action

join
Posted on Leave a comment

DCPLH v Caernarvon Cherry Pty Ltd – potential growers class action

Biteroit - Caernarvon Cherry

DCP Litigation Holdings is inviting expressions of interest from potential class action claimants against Caernarvon Cherry Pty Ltd ACN 111 047 191 (“Caernarvon”).

Caernarvon Cherry Pty Ltd is a fruit packing operator located at 474 Canobolas Rd, Orange NSW 2800 and predominantly packs Cherries and Apples under the Biteriot brand for Woolworths, Harris Farm and numerous export supermarket chains.

DCP Litigation Holdings is the assignee of the claims of a number of fruit growers from around the Nashdale, Mudgee and Orange / Mt. Canobolas fruit-growing regions.

What is a class action?

 

A class action is a permitted court action involving 7 or more claimants with substantially similar claims against the same defendant or defendant/s.

What’s the class action about?

 

We will be arguing, amongst other things, that:

  1. Caernarvon breached the Horticultural Code of Conduct which is a mandatory code within the fruit packing and wholesale sector ;
  2. Caernarvon provided misleading and deceptive fruit packing statistics and materially underpaid our assignees – causing loss ;
  3. In addition, Caernarvon overcharged our assignees for packing services, fruit picking services, packaging, transport, fruit handling, storage and /or otherwise.  In some cases, we have seen evidence where, Caernarvon charged our assignee grower up to almost 400 hours of labour in one summer season for the provision of a “person” / alleged staff member – this ‘person’ having no date of birth, no bank account, no tax file number, no superannuation membership, and no address … (the person actually is alleged to reside at the same address as Caernarvon, 474 Canobolas Rd – together with approximately 100 other alleged staff members) ;
  4. Moreover, Caernarvon at the time of the apparent overcharging of our grower assignee, also charged our grower assignee for the services of a “pay mistress”, Ms. Paula Neill formerly of Landseer St, RaglanAround the same time, Ms. Neill pleaded guilty to stealing the sum of $44,864.56 from a local charity known BINC ;
  5. Caernarvon failed to conduct its fruit growing operations in a workmanlike manner.

And in the process, Caernarvon caused our assignee loss and/or damage.

To be clear, we do not accuse Ms. Paula Neil of any criminal offence, however we do say that Caernarvon itself, with some 900 persons on its payroll did engage in misleading and deceptive conduct causing loss to our assignee, and we believe it is highly likely that a number of other fruit growers from the Orange and nearby locality also suffered loss (we have spoken to many).

Moreover, we say that the assignee is entitled to query the veracity of various expenses, which they have, and about which questions still remain outstanding (Caernarvon refusing or neglecting to account or answer questions).

DCP Litigation Holdings are inviting expressions of interest from other growers and suppliers to Caernarvon Cherry, to discuss the claims with potential class action fruit growers and claimants, who have had a similar detrimental financial experience with Caernarvon.  It will be our proposal to fund all litigation costs of all fruit growers accepted against Caernarvon and to share in any settlement payment or judgment of a relevant court.

How big does my claim have to be?

A class-action is ideally suited to large or small growers.
The size of the claim is not important.
The important aspects of the claim is that they are substantially similar to the what we say above that we will be arguing, i.e. they generally involve the supply of fruit from a grower to Caernarvon and some disagreement about entitlements to money (big or small).
The other important factor is that the defendant must be Caernarvon Cherry Pty Ltd of Orange, NSW.

How fruit growers can get involved?

Regardless of how big or small your claim may be, interested parties are asked to complete the below form to express interest.  Once we receive your enquiry we will email you also our class-action FAQ’s.

CCC class action

join
If you have any comments or information about Bernard & Fiona Hall, we’d love to hear from you including any documents via the instant chats below, through the below form or by phone on 1300-327123.

Posted on Leave a comment

Current projects – credit repair (Job J18190432)

credit repair

DCPS is now undertaking projects to repair customer’s credit files.

Job J18190432 is the repair of a lady’s file where she’d defaulted and received a judgment from the NSW Local Court.  There were also a number of caveat’s on property in which she had an interest.  We assisted the lady with a schedule of payments.  At the end, it was agreed the judgment would be set-aside.  We are in the midst of having that removed from her file.

If a person has a judgment, defaults or bankruptcy then accessing finance can be hard.

Sometimes impossible.

And, IF a person with defaults CAN access credit, they are usually charged very high interest.

DCPS works to restore credit histories. All methods used are legal.

If you have any default judgments or negative credit history, give us a call to discuss how we may be able to help repair your file.  Call anytime on 1300-327123.

DCPS works for you on a success fee basis.  Unless your file is repaired there is no final payment for our service.

Posted on Leave a comment

Divorce finance

Divorce-finance

DCP Capital has developed what it believes is a first.  It has developed a divorce finance solution it can tailor to ensure all parties to a property settlement get a fair deal.

The solution came about when reviewing the plight of divorcing ladies.  Unfortunately, in some cases, the ladies lacked the financial strength to achieve a just and equitable deal.  A fair deal.

Divorce can be an expensive process involving legal concepts and consuming emotions.

The emotional toll can be higher when a divorcee’s assets are being dealt with.

If you want to discuss getting a better deal in your divorce, call us to discuss our divorce funding litigation service – call anytime on 1300-327123.  Alternatively, have your lawyers call us to discuss proper funding.

To view related blogs, case notes or otherwise, follow the following category links and tags below.

Posted on Leave a comment

DCPLH v Swan – current projects (divorce funding)

Divorce-finance

(Work in progress, more details to follow on this page).

DCPLH is currently engaged in litigation, as funder, of the settlement of a property dispute between a formerly married couple – the Swan’s (as at 2 June 2019).

DCPLH has developed a revolutionary service of divorce funding of litigation which it is currently trialling.  The same service may be applicable to wills and estate disputes.

To discuss divorce funding, litigation funding or otherwise – please call us anytime on 1300-327123.

To view related blogs, case notes or otherwise, follow the following category links and tags below.

Posted on Leave a comment

DCPLH v Caernarvon Cherry Pty Ltd – service agreement

Biteroit - Caernarvon Cherry

DCPLH is currently undertaking a statement of claim (as at 6 November 2019) in pursuit of an alleged debt owed by Caernarvon Cherry Pty Ltd to it, as assignee.

The claim seeks damages of upto $621,000 plus legal costs.

The matter is in the NSW District Court.

DCPLH has filed this statement of claim in late September 2019 with a defence due by the late November 2019.

DCPLH is also assisting a group of local fruit growers from the Orange District of NSW with preparations for a class-action against Caernarvon.  To view our class-action page – click here.

To view our main Caernarvon Cherry page – click here.

To view our main Hall family page – click here.

If you have any comments or information about Bernard & Fiona Hall, we’d love to hear from you including any documents via the instant chats below, through the below form or by phone on 1300-327123.

 

 

Updated: 6 November 2019.

Posted on 2 Comments

Craig Matthew Adams – former proprietor of Golden Arrow, Mikara Developments, Bargo Developments, Key Asset Management and more

craig adams

Craig Matthew Adams (“Craig”), who lists his occupation as “investor”, is a former company director.

Craig came to DCPLH’s attention related to several insolvent companies liquidated in mid to late 2018.  The group of companies includes:

  1. Golden Arrow International Pty Ltd
  2. Bargo Developments Pty Ltd
  3. Mikara Developments Pty Ltd
  4. Mikara Investments Pty Ltd
  5. Greenviews Castle Hill Pty Ltd

Craig is personally bankrupt.  A copy of the sequestration order is viewable here.

Craig was personally liable for a debt of $4m (plus interest) from Mohan KumarDCPLH is the assignee of Mohan Kumar for the fruit of that debt.  DCPLH is also the assignee of Reliance Leasing for a small debt owed by Craig and Bargo at the time of Craig’s bankruptcy.

Craig was made bankrupt on 13 December 2018 by a debt owed to Australasian Property Group Pte Ltd (“Australasian”).  Craig trustee in bankruptcy is Andy Scott of PWC.

Presently, Craig’s debt to Australasian is $2,059,753.46 (as at 31 May 2019).  Australasian are yet to recover the alleged debt (as at 31 May 2019) according to published documents.

Craig’s creditor’s report is available for inspection here.